12/17/2011
Questioning the Premedical Paradigm: Enhancing Diversity in the Medical Profession a Century after the Flexner Report Review
Average Reviews:
(More customer reviews)Donald A. Barr MD, PhD's Questioning the Premedical Paradigm: Enhancing Diversity in the Medical Profession after the Flexner Report considers the history and problems involved in using the premedical formula developed more than a century ago to select students for training as modern physicians. Premedical standards actually have proved poor indicators of clinical competency: this book offers a history and review of these standards and offers new insights for change. College-level medical libraries should have this.
Click Here to see more reviews about: Questioning the Premedical Paradigm: Enhancing Diversity in the Medical Profession a Century after the Flexner Report
This book raises fundamental questions about the propriety of continuing to use a premedical curriculum developed more than a century ago to select students for training as future physicians for the twenty-first century. In it, Dr. Donald A. Barr examines the historical origins, evolution, and current state of premedical education in the United States. One hundred years ago, Abraham Flexner's report onMedical Education in the United States and Canada helped establish the modern paradigm of premedical and medical education. Barr's research finds the system of premedical education that evolved to be a poor predictor of subsequent clinical competency and professional excellence, while simultaneously discouraging many students from underrepresented minority groups or economically disadvantaged backgrounds from pursuing a career as a physician. Analyzing more than fifty years of research, Barr shows that many of the best prospects are not being admitted to medical schools, with long-term adverse consequences for the U.S. medical profession. The root of the problem, Barr argues, is the premedical curriculum-which overemphasizes biology, chemistry, and physics by teaching them as separate, discrete subjects. In proposing a fundamental restructuring of premedical education, Barr makes the case for parallel tracks of undergraduate science education: one that would largely retain the current system; and a second that would integrate the life sciences in a problem-based, collaborative learning pedagogy. Barr argues that the new, integrated curriculum will encourage greater educational and social diversity among premedical candidates without weakening the quality of the education. He includes an evaluative research framework to judge the outcome of such a restructured system.This historical and cultural analysis of premedical education in the United States is the crucial first step in questioning the appropriateness of continuing a hundred-year-old, empirically dubious pedagogical model for the twenty-first century.
Labels:
medical equipment,
medical supplies,
medicine
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment